Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nathan's avatar

So why phrase this as a 'mistake'? Clearly it's an effort to misquote the OSHA response in order to claim expert evidence for his concurring opinion where none exists. If I turned that in as an undergraduate it would have meant an F. But this court is failing America at every turn so why not expect them to lie about the sources of their data?

Expand full comment
Dana's avatar

Questions: Did the other Justices know this? And if so, don’t they have an obligation and responsibility to make the “mistake” known? If they didn’t or don’t know, why not? Don’t they have an equal obligation and responsibility to know this through researching and/or checking any claims presented by their colleagues as fact from the bench?

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts